EITHER SCROLL DOWN OR CLICK ON THE SPECIFIC HEADINGS
Articles (including letters to editor) - pro and con are listed below. 
 

2008 news        2007 news       2006 news         2005 news         before 2005

Transportation takes center stage at forum
By Chris Bosak
Norwalk Hour   March 19, 2010                             top of page

Can we keep Fairfield County moving? That was the question posed by the League of Women Voters of Connecticut to a panel of transportation and business experts at Thursday night's Transportation Forum at Norwalk Community College.

The answer often boiled down to three suggestions: preservation of our existing infrastructure, congestion pricing, and building transit- and pedestrian-friendly communities. Even that might not be enough, however, as the state's transportation budget falls far short of what is needed, according to the panelists.

"I'm happy spring is here," Floyd Lapp, executive director of the South Western Regional Planning Agency, said, "but the bloom is off the transportation rose."

Christopher Bruhl, president and CEO of The Business Council of Fairfield County, said selecting the right governor this November will go a long way toward solving the transportation problems of Fairfield County and the state. He said the General Assembly is "even more dysfunctional now than before" because of the state's huge deficit and the solutions talked about at the forum "are not going to be addressed," in the near future.

"For now we just let Department of Transportation officials do the best with what they have to work with right now," he said. "We need to make the candidates for governor aware that transportation is not a transferable expense."

Kate Slevin, executive director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign (TSTC), said the state needs to follow a "fix-it-first" strategy of maintaining and preserving our current roads and bridges. Widening roads and building new roads does not solve congestion problems in the long run, she said.

"There are no new highway projects on the books," she said. "We think that's good."

Slevin pushed for more bike- and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure as well.

She suggested tolls, pricing to reduce congestion and "other creative" solutions to funding the projects. TSTC is a nonprofit organization focusing on transportation issues in Connecticut, downstate New York and New Jersey.

Jeffrey Parker of Connecticut Department of Transportation said only six percent of the $787 billion federal stimulus package went to improving transportation. Connecticut, he said, received $300 million for roads and bridges, and $157 million for transit improvements. ConnDOT is focusing heavily on preservation, Parker said, including projects on the Merritt Parkway and repairing a bridge in Branford.

"Connecticut had large infrastructure projects that needed to be done," he said. "We're off and running."

One important transit project, he said, is the signalization of the Danbury branch. He also said the new M8 rail cars should be tested this summer and in service by the fall.

Lapp said the United States underfunds transportation by about 40 percent and the stimulus package did not put nearly enough focus on transportation.

He continued his fight for congestion pricing and stressed that a study ought to be continued to determine its feasibility. A $1 million study that had been conducted only concluded that another study should be done. Half a million dollars has been allocated for that second study, but it hasn't been conducted yet.

"Let's really make it happen," he said. "We cut off the follow up."

Congestion pricing, he said, would add revenue to the state, increase the flow of traffic, encourage transit and clean the air -- "all things that we want to see," Lapp said.

Bruhl supports a significant increase in the gas tax, but added that: "Any solution has to be sustainable. We need to look beyond this recession. It also won't help to use the wrong forecast like we did 30 years when we missed the phenomena of women going to work."

Bruhl said it is important not to overlook the aging population and immigrants when planning the future of transportation.

Route 7 study group focuses on transportation, land-use patterns
Kara O'connor, Hour Staff Writer
Norwalk Hour   March 2, 2010                             top of page
Making changes so the community gets what it wants is the main goal and purpose of the Rt. 7 transportation and study group, according to Susan VanBenschoten, Consultant Project Manager of the study group and chief operating adviser for Fitzgerald and  Halliday Inc.

“This study group is about studying the existing transportation and land-use patterns of Rt. 7 and how to enhance them,” said VanBenschoten.  “Improving the quality of life around the corridor and developing a proactive plan is something we plan to do.”

The  Rt. 7 transportation and study group, sponsored by The South Western Regional Planning Association (SWRPA) and Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials (HVCEO ) was first initiated in July 2009.  According to Craig Lader, project manager of the study group and Senior Transportation Planner of SWRPA, the study group was implemented to deal with the issues that affect the lives of nearby residents and other users of the roadway. 

“The study group will evaluate current transportation and land use conditions and investigate opportunities to make improvements by looking at the existing road structure,” said Lader.  “It’s an opportunity to improve safety and land use on Rt. 7.  It’s pretty straightforward.” 

The study group focused on transportation, land use, safety and market patterns along Rt. 7 from Grist Mill Rd. on the Norwalk/Wilton border to Merribrook Rd. near Danbury, said VanBenschoten. 

According to VanBenschoten one of the main topics that the study group focused on was transit-oriented development, which is a plan to develop compact, mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods surrounding a transit center or hub such as a train station or bus/intermodal center.  VanBenschoten said that there were four areas around Rt. 7 that had opportunities for transit-oriented development:  I-Park, which is located on the Norwalk/Wilton border; Wilton center, Georgetown and Branchville. 

“We want people to drive along Rt. 7 and feel they are coming into a great place,” said VanBenschoten.  “These four places are definitely an opportunity for us to expand on that.”

According to New Milford resident Beth Mortgan, she doesn’t agree that there should be a study group on the Rt. 7 corridor. 

“I know people that avoid Rt. 7 at all costs, taking back roads, highways, anything and that isn’t going to change,” said Morgan.  “I think that this study is a waste of time and money.”

Wilton resident and Sierra Club CT chapter member Patrice Gillespie said she thinks it is wonder that a study group is looking at the patterns along Rt. 7.

“I think this is a great idea,” said Gillespie.  “My only concern is that the study group should look a little more into Rt. 7’s history, I think a lot of people think that is a very important part of Rt. 7.”

SWRPA seeks public input on Route 7 woes
By Martin B Cassidy, Staff Writer
Advocate, February 22, 2010                                                              top of page

In the future, transit-oriented development could allow residents along Route 7 to walk safely to revamped Danbury line train stations or take advantage of more frequent bus service, while widening the state road could make travel less burdensome in the economically important corridor, Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi said.

Zoning regulations will need to be changed in some areas along the four-lane road if towns hope to see the type of residential developments that could reduce automobile traffic near train stations, Marconi said.

"We need to do a corridor study to figure out how we can get the most out of the potential of Route 7," Marconi said. "There has been a lot of discussion about it, but we need to do an assessment of the use along the road."

Residents from Norwalk to Danbury will have a chance to offer their views about traffic in the Route 7 corridor this week when the Southwestern Regional Planning Agency and the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials host a public information meeting on the Route 7 Transportation and Land Use Study.

The $375,000 study, to be conducted by the engineering firm Fitzgerald & Halliday, will analyze traffic on Route 7 and how to manage future land use to encourage safer traffic flow and increased use of buses and the Danbury Branch of the Metro-North Railroad.

The meeting will be held Thursday from 6:30 to 8:30 p.m at Wilton High School, 395 Danbury Road, Wilton.

The study will not evaluate whether the state should pursue building Super 7, a decades-old concept of building a four-lane expressway between Norwalk and Danbury, and instead focuses on the potential of the existing transportation system to keep up with demand, SWRPA Senior Transportation Coordinator Sue Prosi said.

The study also will use traffic accident data to evaluate where improvements such as curb cuts, widening the roadway or adding sidewalks could improve safety, Prosi said.

"It will look at improvements at specific intersections and make recommendations for what measures can address the conditions there," Prosi said.

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING     Thursday, February 25, 2010
DATE RESCHEDULED TO MARCH 1, 2010
Wilton High School Cafeteria
395 Danbury Road
Wilton, CT 06897
Informal Open House: 6:30 pm - 8:30 pm
Presentation 7:00 pm                                                                                  top of page

The South Western Regional Planning Agency (SWRPA) along with the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials (HVCEO) is conducting a transportation and land use study of Route 7 between Norwalk and Danbury. Route 7 is a critical transportation connection for life in southwestern Connecticut. This segment of Route 7 has been studied for years and some portions have been rebuilt over the decades in order to improve travel. Likewise, commuter rail on the Danbury Branch is currently being studied to determine the best way to improve rail service in the corridor.

Still, there are gaps in the transportation system both on the roadway itself and with options to better connect to the public transportation system that serves the corridor.
This study will look for ways to improve and interconnect the various components of the transportation system; the roadway, commuter rail, bus travel, walking, and biking. The study will also evaluate how land is currently used in the corridor and how it could be used in the future to work with the transportation system serving it.

The study will focus on Route 7 within Danbury, Ridgefield, Redding, and Wilton. The study will not evaluate the need for an expressway from Danbury to Norwalk, but will instead investigate ways to maximize the efficiency and safety of all modes of the existing transportation system.

The first of three public information meetings is being held to present and discuss the study scope, status, the vision for the corridor, and to review existing transportation and land use conditions.
Area residents, business owners, commuters, and all interested stakeholders are encouraged to attend this meeting to share your views about issues and opportunities for improvement in the Route 7 corridor. For study and meeting information, please visit www.route7study.org or contact:

South Western Regional Planning Agency (SWRPA)
Craig Lader (Study Project Manager)
203-316-5190
lader@swrpa.org

Snow Date: In the event of inclement weather, the meeting will be held at the same location and time on Monday, March 1, 2010

Route 7 expressway unrealistic, leaders say   
By Martin B. Cassidy, Staff Writer, Advocate
10/7/2009                                                                              top of page

WILTON -- State Sen. Toni Boucher and other leaders rallied Tuesday to take aim at the decades-old concept of a superhighway between Norwalk and Danbury and berate recent efforts to present the project as a viable solution to congestion in the corridor.  Tuesday morning at Wilton Town Hall, Wilton First Selectman Bill Brennan said a recent public campaign by state Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, to revive the long-rejected concept of a four-lane expressway linking Interstate 95 in Norwalk to I-84 in Danbury as misguided and economically destructive.

"I urge Senator Duff to use his passion for roads and spending to fix I-95 first," Brennan said. "...For almost 40 years this road has been discussed, but never constructed. Why? The people most strongly impacted by it are opposed to it."  On Tuesday morning, Boucher, a Republican legislator from Wilton was joined by Brennan, Ridgefield First Selectman Rudy Marconi, and state Reps. John Hetherington, R-New Canaan, and Peggy Reeves, D-Norwalk to promise staunch legal and community opposition to squelch consideration of the long-delayed highway.

For now, the state must focus on its investments to widen Route 7 and a $35 million project to upgrade signals on the Danbury to Norwalk rail line, officials said.  "This road would never come into being for at least a generation and the benefits would never be felt by anyone here during their working life," Hetherington said. "But unfortunately the pain would start right away."

During the 2009 legislative session, Boucher successfully sponsored legislation to lift a previous bar on selling hundreds of acres of land being held by the state for possible construction of the highway.  In July, Transportation Commissioner Joseph Marie wrote Gov. M. Jodi Rell to tout the benefits of selling off some of the land to raise revenue for the state and free transportation workers from the obligation of caring for the properties.

The Department of Transportation controls more than 890 acres of vacant land along the right-of-way for the Route 7 expressway, with an estimated value of $80 million to $150 million, according to the DOT.  Boucher also said that a state-funded poll conducted by the University of Connecticut done at the request of Duff was also inaccurate and used methods that could lead to a biased result.

The poll indicated that more residents between Norwalk and Danbury support the idea of the highway than oppose it.  Yesterday Duff defended the survey of 483 residents as statistically valid.  Duff maintained that the officials are part of a minority group that has thus far successfully blocked the highway project which is vital for the state's economy.

Duff said even with rail-line improvements and the current widening; without the highway the corridor will be dead economically if it can't handle traffic smoothly.  "It is imperative to get the road built for our economic success," Duff said. "This isn't an either or, but for the residents of the affected towns it would be much better to get the through traffic onto a highway and let the regular Route 7 become a local road."

Leaders ponder in-depth Route 7 traffic study, transit funding requests
By Martin B. Cassidy, Staff Writer, Advocate
9/22/9                                                                                  top of page

State leaders should not rule out the long-debated concept of an expressway linking Norwalk to Danbury without a long-range blueprint for how to relieve congestion along Route 7, Weston First Selectman Woody Bliss said.

Bliss and the leaders of seven other Fairfield County municipalities will vote Thursday on whether to back completion of a study to identify whether the expressway, or improved rail or bus lines, would improve the flow of traffic along the route.

The South Western Regional Municipal Planning Organization meets at 8:15 a.m. Thursday at the Norwalk Transit District, 125 Wilson Ave.  Bliss, the group's chairman, said area leaders are concerned the long-stalled expressway project might be permanently scuttled if the state acts on 2008 legislation allowing it to sell off land acquired to build it in order to now raise revenue for other state expenses.  Since the 1970s, leaders and residents from Ridgefield , Wilton , and Redding have successfully rallied opposition to table the expressway project.

Leaders call for Route 7 transit study
By Martin B. Cassidy, Staff Writer, Advocate
09/24/2009                                                                         top of page

The elected leaders of eight lower Fairfield County municipalities gave unanimous support Thursday to a fuller study of an unfinished expressway and other possible projects to make travel easier along the bustling Route 7 corridor.

The vote prompted an exchange of views among leaders about their support or staunch opposition to the decades-old concept of a "Super 7" four-lane highway and whether the long-delayed idea had any merit.  "No city has been affected more by not having a Route 7 expressway than our town," said Norwalk Mayor Dick Moccia, who favors the project. "I think we need a statement to keep all the options open."

The project, first proposed in the 1950s, would create a four-lane highway from Interstate 95 in Norwalk to Interstate 84 in Danbury . The initial portion of the road was completed from Interstate 95 in Norwalk to near the Wilton town line. Opposition from environmentalists and nearby residents has stalled the remainder of the expressway, according to local officials.  A list of prioritized projects, whether it included the Super 7 expressway or not, should be compiled before ruling the road out, Weston First Selectman Woody Bliss, chairman of the group said.

"The point is to look at the infrastructure system and not just Super 7 but the future economic development of this region and enabling workers to get from where they live to where they work," he said.  The resolution did not specifically ask that the state efrain from selling 14 state-owned homes and other property in the proposed path of highway. In July, in a letter to Gov. M. Jodi Rell, state Transportation Commissioner Joseph Marie touted the benefits of selling off the state-owned homes in the proposed expressway path, in response to Rell's request from state department heads for lists of saleable properties to raise revenue during the state budget crisis.

The Department of Transportation controls more than 890 acres of vacant land along the right-of-way for the Route 7 expressway, with an estimated value of $80 million to $150 million, according to the DOT.  Any sale of the land reserved for Super 7 had been barred until passage last year of a law sponsored by state Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton, a staunch opponent of the project. 

At Thursday's meeting, state Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, presented the results of a recently conducted UConn-Stamford survey that says more residents support Super 7 than oppose it.  The survey included 486 responses, including 164 respondents in Norwalk and 100 in Danbury , several times the number of responses for towns like Wilton , Redding and Ridgefield , which showed lower support for the road, according to the survey.

Boucher expressed bafflement at Duff's effort to spur debate about the expressway and also the survey results.  "Quite frankly there were practical reasons it wasn't supported throughout the region," Boucher said of Super 7.  Aside from environmental and economic concerns, Wilton First Selectman Bill Brennan told members that completion of the Super 7 project, which is estimated to cost billions, should be permanently shelved, if only because of state and national budget deficits. 

"We should be listening to the people in this country and this state," Brennan said. "They want government spending reduced and are alarmed over the future consequences of runaway national and state debt that will eventually require higher taxes."  Three residents at the meeting spoke in favor of the Super 7 project eventually being completed. "With population growth in this country, the Route 7 Expressway is something that should eventually be done," Melvin Moore of Darien said.  Last week, members of the Southwestern Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization met with Marie to discuss the state's long-range plans for Route 7, and ask that design and other groundwork for another project, the Route 7/Merritt Parkway interchange, be prioritized, Bliss said. That project is estimated to cost $156 million.

Marie said last week that he was happy to meet with officials about transportation priorities, but that only a limited number of larger-scale construction projects could be funded, given maintenance needs and funding constraints.  "The reality is that there are considerably greater needs than available resources, and we must make sure we are addressing preservation challenges first," he said. "In other words, we must ask ourselves if it makes sense to remodel our kitchen when the roof is leaking."

UConn Stamford poll indicates support for Super 7 expressway
By Martin B. Cassidy, Advocate                                 top of page
09/10/2009

More area residents support plans for the Super 7 expressway between Norwalk and Danbury than oppose it, according to a new survey, state Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, said Wednesday, evidence he hopes can help overcome long odds of resurrecting the decades-old project.

Duff, a long-time supporter of the project, said the $10,000 survey of residents from 11 area municipalities should help reveal that a small, organized minority of environmentalists and residents of smaller towns like Ridgefield and Wilton have halted the project by creating a false impression they were in the majority.

The poll, conducted by the University of Connecticut Stamford, was paid for using a grant Duff requested from the state budget office to research “residents' opinions" about completing the road.

"For 30 years we've heard that there isn't support for Super 7 but this debunks that myth," Duff said of the survey. "This shows there is a tremendous amount of support and people want this highway built."

The state Department of Transportation has begun to consider selling off 890 acres set aside along the route to complete the project, and DOT Commissioner Joseph Marie has expressed strong doubts about the project moving forward.

Overall 53 percent of 486 respondents support the highway idea, while only six percent of those surveyed opposed the project, according to the survey.

Clear support for the project was strongest in Danbury, where 65 of 100 respondents backed the project, followed by Norwalk where 89 of 164 respondents, or 53 percent, favored the expressway. Less than 5 percent of residents in both Danbury and Norwalk opposed the project, with the remaining chunks falling into the neutral or unsure categories.

Opposition was strongest in Ridgefield, where 6 of 32 respondents, or 18.8 percent, opposed the project, and in Wilton, where 14 out of 32, or 16 percent, opposed it. By contrast 47 percent of Ridgefield residents supported the work, along with 44 percent in Wilton, according to the survey.

The study was conducted using a "snowball" sampling technique, in which target members of the community are asked to help survey takers identify other targeted respondents to answer the questions. Initially, only 23 of 500 recipients who were contacted for the survey responded, according to the results. Residents of the municipalities surveyed, which included New Canaan, Redding, Wilton, Westport, Darien, and Bethel, were asked to rate their familiarity with Route 7, how much they use it, their familiarity with the Super 7 expressway concept and if the highway was important to them.

State Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton, an opponent of the Super 7 expressway project, questioned the survey results, saying it was counter to what she knew about public sentiment among her Wilton and Ridgefield constituents.

Michael Ego, assistant vice provost of UConn Stamford, who oversaw the study, said it was statistically reliable, and that the snowball sampling method is a valid and accurate way to get a picture of residents' opinions.

"The $10,000 grant provided to us enabled us to conduct a formal social science research study that we believe is valid and reliable to gather residents' perceptions of a proposed extension of the Super 7 route," Ego said. "We showed no bias towards the outcome of the study and chose this methodology to gather the data."

During the past legislative session, Boucher successfully introduced the legislation setting aside the prohibition on selling the 890 acres it had acquired along the corridor to serve as a right-of-way for the eventual completion of the Super 7 expressway.

"I find it inconsistent with what I know about my constituents in my district," Boucher said of the survey results. "The leaders in the affected towns could spend $10,000 and get very different results and every hearing that we had on this issue drew 500 or 600 people against it, and maybe 10 in favor."

Boucher emphasized that in the late 1990s, when the legislature last formally debated the Super 7 project, leaders agreed to widen Route 7 between Wilton and Danbury as a compromise between with the more extensive expressway project and the environmental and traffic concerns of opponents.

"The state has focused its efforts on widening the existing roadway from Danbury to Wilton and on improving mass transit and other multi-modal forms of transport," Boucher said. "The Super 7 bill has never garnered enough support because it isn't very realistic."

On Wednesday, Weston First Selectman Woody Bliss, chairman of the South West Regional Metropolitan Planning Organization, and others appeared with Duff to tout the results of the survey.

Bliss said that leaders in southern Fairfield County towns support the expressway project to help speed travel between Danbury and Norwalk, which will make it easier to work and travel over longer distances.

"I think our position has been consistently in favor of this link between Danbury and Norwalk," Bliss said. "This survey is tremendous confirmation that people see why this is needed."

State Rep. Christopher Perone, D-Norwalk, said that he thought it was odd that some Wilton and Ridgefield residents opposed construction of Super 7 based on traffic concerns, given that many think the larger road would help alleviate what he called a growing problem with traffic cutting through residential neighborhoods.

"By not doing anything, we're not improving the situation, we're compounding it," Perone said.

State DOT Considers Selling Route 7 property            top of page
By Brian Lockhart, Staff Writer   Advocate
8/20/2009

Want to buy a home along a never-built expressway?  The state Department of Transportation has outlined to the governor the benefits of selling off 14 residences purchased years ago by the state for the expansion of the old Route 7 connecting Norwalk and Danbury.

On July 14 Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell wrote her commissioners and agency heads asking they provide her with lists of saleable assets to help raise revenue during the budget crisis.  Those lists were due July 27 but her office last week was not releasing the details, saying it was still awaiting information.

But the DOT, at The Advocate's request, supplied a copy of a letter Commissioner Joseph Marie sent to Rell outlining properties identified by his department.  Marie said the DOT's Excess Property Inventory Unit identified 2,840 potential parcels divided among 87 municipalities

"The majority of the parcels identified are uneconomic remnants that remain form properties acquired for transportation projects and only have value to an abutting property owner," Marie wrote.

But Marie said the state has valuable land holdings for two dormant express way projects --Route 6, which was intended to proved quicker passage through Andover, Bolton and Coventry, and Route 7.

In total the DOT controls more than 890 acres of vacant land in the Route 7 expressway or Super 7 right of way totaling an estimated $80 million to $150 million, Marie wrote Rell.  The General Assembly in 1993 amended state statutes specifically restricting the sale of any Route 7 properties. But that requirement was lifted during the recently concluded legislative session with the help of Sen. Toni Boucher, R-Wilton,
Marie did not specifically advise selling the vacant land. But he told Rell 14 improved parcels -- properties with homes in Wilton, Ridgefield, Redding and Danbury -- have proven "a liability to the department" and are valued at $6.6 million.

The state acquired the Super 7 properties decades ago to build a four- to six-lane expressway from Norwalk to Danbury. Long-standing opposition from environmentalists and smaller towns along the route has all but killed prospects for Super 7's completion, and the DOT is widening the existing Route 7.

Over the years the DOT has rented the 14 homes to tenants, resulting in a modest income.

According to DOT data the monthly rent ranges from around $1,158 for ranch at 29 Fire Hill Road in Ridgefield, built in 1950, to $3,000 for the colonial at 11 West Stars Plain Rd. in Danbury, built pre-1967.

But Marie told Rell the lengthy amount of time it takes the state to generate lease agreements and obtain tenants can result in vacancies which leads to vagrancy and vandalism.

He also said the Route 7 expressway is not included in any of the DOT's major initiatives planned through 2025 and were it to proceed, the environmental permitting process might very well require a change in the initial right-of-way.

"The release of these 14 properties does not further jeopardize the future of a Route 7 Expressway as state ownership is incomplete and the location of the corridor has not been finalized," Marie wrote. "However it would relieve the state of continual maintenance and liability and allow department personnel, which have been significantly reduced due to the retirement incentive plan, to focus on primary responsibilities that support active transportation projects."

Keep the 'Super 7' option open                           top of page
Editorial, Advocate                                              2/8/9

Despite current fiscal pressures, the state should not be panicked into a fire sale, particularly with almost 900 acres of land that were purchased for the so-called Super 7 highway that has remained uncompleted for decades. Connecticut officials need to take the long view and do what's best for state residents and businesses.
State Sen. Toni Boucher of Wilton has proposed legislation to either sell the property or designate it as open space. She says the state could sure use the money from the sale. But as a practical matter, it's currently a tough market for selling property. It was valued at almost $150 million in 2007, but it seems doubtful that the state would realize that amount now.

Beyond that, we concur with state Sen. Bob Duff of Norwalk and other officials and area residents who have not given up on the idea of the highway. Given past opposition and monetary concerns, it may be hard to envision such a link between Interstates 95 and 84. And with the state focusing on mass transit to help address chronic traffic congestion, it's easy to dismiss the idea.

But Connecticut needs both roads and mass transit. And the traffic situation is not likely to improve given the current level of development and the expectation of more in the future. Economically, businesses and employees will continue to suffer because of problems with commuting and shipping. Further, air quality will continue to suffer with the emissions from congested traffic.

The state should not eliminate options for this land. If traffic continues to be problems for economic growth and quality of life, and perhaps worsen, opinions may well change.

Super 7's Cost, Letter to Editor, Advocate                 2/6//9             top of page

Yesterday's headline in The Advocate ("Rell lowers the hammer") is a sobering reminder of Connecticut's precarious economic condition and a situation that should be of deep concern to all our citizens.  Apparently the news hasn't gotten through to at least one citizen, as evidenced by his rambling rant about the selfish citizens who are blocking completion of Super 7 ("Highway needs," Letters from readers). 

So where is the state of CT going to come up with the estimated $1.4 billion to complete  Super 7? 

I have a great idea, one that should resonate with the letter writer who hails from Greenwich.  The state can simply impose a "windfall profits tax" on the financial sector geniuses who live in Greenwich, and who have enriched themselves over the past five to 10 years with shamelessly high salaries and bonuses (and contributed mightily to the hard times we are now in).

Surely these Masters of the universe can spare a measly $1.4 billion of their plunder to have an easy access as possible to Foxwoods or Mohegan Sun casinos. 

Steve Symonds, Wilton

Letter to Editor, Wilton Villager        2/6/9              top of page

With federal "Stimulus" funds soon to be available, and with the required Wilton land already owned by the State, this is the time to get moving with the extension beyond Norwalk. Add to this the fact that much or most of the engineering and environmental-impact issues are behind us. So the stimulus impact will be much sooner than otherwise.

Super Seven is going to be an urgent need sooner or later -- and probably sooner, given that the widened old Route Seven will bless us with additional stop-lights, a likely proliferation of strip malls, and the addition of traffic which had previously used secondary roads. Moreover, absent any center-dividers, motorists' need to change lanes could well lead to an increase in head-on collisions.

At the very least, the State should hold on to the right-of-way it already owns. It acquired this land cheaply; and if it now sells the land, the price it gets will probably be much less than the amount it will pay when it re-buys a right-of-way later on. The proposed legislation by State Senators Toni Boucher and Judi Freedman is ill advised. And with Wilton's ever worsening traffic, these ladies may not even be playing such smart local politics.

With federal "Stimulus" funds soon to be available, and with the required Wilton land already owned by the State, this is the time to get moving with the extension beyond Norwalk. Add to this the fact that much or most of the engineering and environmental-impact issues are behind us. So the stimulus impact will be much sooner than otherwise.

Lew Rose, Wilton

Highway Needs, Letter to Advocate  2/3/2009       (PDF file)                  top of page
Jonathan Wilcox, author

Letter sent 2/1/2009                                                     top of page
Dear Ms. Simmat, Mr. Hammersley, Mr. Marie:

I have just read the proposals for the RT 7 Bills. Let me be blunt about this. A lot of time, years, taxpayer money and effort went into acquiring this land for a specific use, a new RT 7. Most of the people who live here now have little knowledge of the history of this original road building project. I can say for sure if they did many would be good and mad that a previous generation stopped this road. Most all of that previous generation have probably moved away. I would also add that those families, or heirs of same, who were forced to sell their land 50 years ago should come after the state for money they may have lost by not retaining appreciating real estate. The towns also lost the tax base from those properties, putting the burden on the remaining homes. The current families living in Wilton, or commuting through it, are now putting up with several years of road expansion on a limited stretch of old RT 7. That causes traffic jams, increased cost of police to direct traffic, and the business closing or income reduction of the merchants who are located in the current construction areas. With the advent of GPS many others are finding the numerous back roads that circumvent RT 7 placing traffic on routes that were never intended for that volume,to say nothing of the safety issues and increased road maintenance.

It does not take a "Certified" traffic engineer to figure out that the "Z" intersection at Grist Mill Road in Norwalk is but a harbinger of what will occur in Wilton when the current "Expansion" is finished on that part of the road. Sure it will make turns easier because of the "5th" lane in Wilton, but most will be heading north or south, the road will go back to two lanes, and their are already some "5th" lanes that do little to help in the areas between Grist Mill and Rt 33. This is a regional situation, and should be not be a town or minority special interest dictated program, the area is to large, and the area population has increased to much, for that mentality in this day and age.

While the economy at this point probably does not allow for limited access highway building, it is not a good idea to declare the land as "Open Space" or give it up as a future road right of way, because someday there will be a vocal group that has the common sense to realize that a road is needed, just as much as an improvement to the train line is needed. There currently probably are a majority that would welcome the new RT 7, but they are busy raising families, making a living, commuting, and have little time to get involved in that goal. On top of that what good is "Open Space" is you can't get to it!!

As a final note on this, I recently had to purchase a car. I could have saved some money buying it in Danbury, but given the valuable time, and aggravation, of getting there for service etc, I decided to buy in Fairfield, and I mentioned that to the Danbury dealer. I am told that I not the first to mention this.

Don't allow this land to be given up, it will be used for it's originally intended purpose someday, and it was paid for with taxpayer money for that reason.

Sincerely

Chauncey O. Johnstone

Editorial, Wilton Villager
January 26, 2009                  top of page

It's an old song and the tune has gotten no better over the years.   We're referring to not one but two bills that have been introduced into the General Assembly designed to kill off the Route 7 extension project once and for all.  The bills have been introduced by new state Sen. Antonietta Boucher, R-26 that would carry on her long campaign against the limited access highway to Danbury and beyond.

It took years to get as far as New Canaan Avenue (Route 123) and nearly another decade to get it to Grist Mill Road near the Wilton town line.  As a state representative, the senator made her opposition to the highway her mantra, even though public opinion in Wilton over the new road has changed over the years.

One of the two bills she introduced would authorize the Department of Transportation to sell off the land it owns in Wilton or turn it over to the Department of Environmental Protection as open space.

The second bill would allow any land not used for 20 years after its sale to be turned over to the DEP as open space.  Given the present economic position both the state and the nation is in at the moment, it's obvious that construction isn't on the radar right now.

It is not impossible, however, that such a project could become a part of the economic stimulus package. At least extending the road from Grist Mill Road to the intersection of the old Route 7 and lower Route 33 could be a possibility.  The sad part of it is if the state had spent the money it has spent on widening portions of the old highway and sought to build the leg to that intersection, it could be a reality.

We don't agree with the lawmaker's portrayal of a new Route 7 as another I-95 ( the Lodge Turnpike). The planned highway is hardly that -- if anything it's more like the Merritt Parkway.  Another indication of the changing sentiment in Wilton is the existence of the Committee for the Extension of Route 7. Its members see it as an answer to congestion on Route 7 -- so do we. We have always supported improvements to mass transit and, in particular, to improving service on the Danbury branch of Metro-North, including electrifying the line and increasing service.  Extending the new Route 7 would complement an improved rail system, not compete with it.

Wilton senator wants to end 'Super 7' project                        1/26/9
By Brian Lockhart, Staff Writer   Norwalk Advocate               top of page

A state senator from Wilton wants to put a stake in the long-dormant project to build the "Super 7" expressway linking Norwalk to Danbury.  Toni Boucher, ranking Republican on the legislature's Transportation Committee, submitted two bills that would allow the state Department of Transportation to get rid of about 890 acres it purchased to build "Super 7" decades ago.

The property in Wilton, Redding, Ridgefield and Danbury cost about $29.4 million at the time of purchase. The four- to six-lane "Super 7" highway was planned 50 years ago.

Rural towns and environmentalists have blocked the project, though it still has supporters, notably Sen. Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, a vice chairman of the Transportation Committee. But the consensus in Hartford is that "Super 7" will not be built anytime soon, if ever.  The DOT instead moved ahead with widening Route 7.

Boucher wants to authorize the DOT to sell the land or transfer it to the state Department of Environmental Protection for open space.  "Given the long and tortuous history of this whole issue and the work we're now doing to widen (Route 7) and improve the train line through there, it makes sense to look at this option, rather than just letting it lie," Boucher said.

DOT spokesman Kevin Nursick said the agency last evaluated the value of the land in February 2007. The nearly 829 vacant acres were worth $149.7 million, he said. The remaining 61 acres had about 20 houses when purchased, he said. He could not immediately provide details about the homes but said the value was $14 million in 2007.

Route 7 Interchange to get hearing in Norwalk         01/23/2009
By Martin B. Cassidy, Staff Writer                             top of page
Norwalk Advocate  

Jo-Ann Horvath said she hopes a much-modified plan for the long-stalled Merritt Parkway interchange with Route 7 in Norwalk will gain public approval and help improve traffic safety in her city.

Drivers exiting the Merritt Parkway at Exit 40B add to hazardous traffic conditions on Main and Glover avenues on their way to Route 7, said Horvath, who lives on Creeping Hemlock Drive off Glover Avenue in Norwalk. She has supported construction of a new interchange since 1985.

Over the past decade, work on a new interchange has been delayed by concerns about ruining the historical character of the parkway, and local residents fearful of noise, traffic and pollution.

"I think the plan is a lot better and addresses a lot of the issues they had," Horvath said. "I'm very ready for this project to start."  The state Department of Transportation will hold another public hearing next month on two similar designs for the long-delayed interchange.

The designs were completed after heeding comments from residents of Silvermine, a historic neighborhood of about 1,700 homes in Norwalk, Wilton and New Canaan. They opposed a design with looping ramps they believed would bring traffic, noise and pollution to the area, said Rich Armstrong, principal engineer for the DOT's Bureau of Engineering and Highway Operations.

Engineers will be on hand at 6:30 p.m. Feb. 25 at Norwalk City Hall, 125 East Ave., to answer questions; a presentation of the plans will follow at 7 p.m.